How JEA Modernized Its Development Services Without Disrupting Stakeholders
Client Overview
Business Challenge
Manual Workflows Hindering Efficiency
Prior to adopting SagesGov, JEA’s development services department was heavily reliant on manual processes:
-
Developers and contractors submitted hard copies of plans to the JEA mailroom.
-
Submittals were physically picked up, logged, and routed to reviewers.
- Communication was fragmented, often handled via email or spreadsheets.
- No centralized visibility existed on review timelines or submission statuses.
Operational Constraints
These manual methods caused:
- Delays due to sequential review workflows.
- Lack of audit trails and submission timestamping.
- Bottlenecks when key reviewers were unavailable.
- Duplication of effort across internal teams.
- Frustration among customers and internal stakeholders due to a lack of transparency.
Solution Selection Criteria
To ensure a successful transformation, JEA had specific requirements:
-
Minimal disruption to internal and external users.
-
Ability to replicate existing submittal routing, naming conventions, and review structures.
-
Configurability for evolving department needs.
- Support for integration with GIS and Single Sign-On (SSO) systems.
- Partner-like support and flexibility from the vendor.
Implementation Highlights
A Phased Rollout, During a Pandemic
Implementation began during the COVID-19 pandemic, adding complexity to the transition. However, the remote development and deployment were executed with minimal friction.
Key implementation milestones:
-
Successful data migration from legacy systems ensured continuity across thousands of ongoing projects.
- GIS integration with multiple counties reduced the need for manual availability checks (averaging 4,500–5,500 annually).
- SSO implementation aligned with internal IT security standards.
- Platform launched on time and within budget.
- Internal IT team rated it as one of the best-executed rollouts they had experienced.
Post-Implementation Outcomes
1. Operational Efficiency Gains
-
Parallel Plan Reviews: Permitting teams now review plans alongside other reviewers rather than waiting until approvals, significantly reducing turnaround times.
- Reduced Open Records Requests: Customers can directly access their submission history, eliminating unnecessary public record inquiries.
- Real-Time Tracking: The development team can now quantify turnaround times and queue volumes-previously impossible due to paper-based intake.
2. Improved Interdepartmental Collaboration
- Plans are routed and reviewed by multiple departments through a single interface.
- Review history and timestamps make handoffs traceable.
- Groups like O&M, metering, and lab teams are looped into inspections earlier, enabling concurrent processes.
3. Customer Satisfaction and Transparency
-
Customers receive submission confirmations and notifications.
-
Shared access allows collaboration among stakeholders (e.g., engineers, project managers).
- The dashboard and comment reports help customers understand who provided feedback and how to follow up.
4. Administrative Autonomy
- JEA can now modify forms, workflows, and user roles internally—accelerating iteration and responsiveness.
- Feature requests are often addressed in future rollouts.
- The team expanded usage across multiple departments post-launch.
User Experience & Accessibility
-
Ease of Use: Both internal teams and external applicants find the interface intuitive.
-
Review Visibility: Bluebeam integration allows all reviewers to see each other’s markups - minimizing overlap.
- Comment Reports: Automated summaries with reviewer names improve accountability and support follow-up communication.
- Inspection Integration: Coordination across inspections, lab work, and service teams occurs in a single workflow.
Support and Partnership
-
Responsiveness: Fast turnaround on tickets and questions.
- Collaboration: Willingness to co-develop or adjust features based on JEA’s feedback.
- Trust: No feature request was outright denied; alternatives were always provided.
Key Metrics & Impact Summary
| Area | Result |
|---|---|
| Permit Review Times | Decreased due to concurrent workflows |
| Operational Visibility | Real-time tracking of submissions and workloads |
| Customer Transparency | High satisfaction from confirmations and self-service access |
| Data Continuity | Legacy project data fully migrated without disruption |
| Collaboration | Streamlined reviews across departments and teams |
| Inspection Efficiency | Inspections now run in tandem with other processes |
| Remote Work Enablement | Entire operation functional during pandemic |
| Autonomy & Flexibility | In-house configuration and workflow management |
Conclusion
JEA’s adoption of SagesGov is a model for how public utilities can modernize complex development services without disrupting trusted processes. The platform's configurability, ease of use, and responsive support team enabled JEA to:
-
Maintain continuity for its stakeholders.
- Improve turnaround times and visibility.
- Streamline cross-functional collaboration.
- Scale system use across additional teams and workflows.
%201%20(1).png?width=237&height=52&name=SagesGov_Logo_2023%20(1)%201%20(1).png)